e003039.full.pdf (1.27 MB)
Download file

A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries

Download (1.27 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 11.09.2013, 15:19 by Emma-Louise Aveling, Peter McCulloch, Mary Dixon-Woods
Objective: Bold claims have been made for the ability of the WHO surgical checklist to reduce surgical morbidity and mortality and improve patient safety regardless of the setting. Little is known about how far the challenges faced by low-income countries are the same as those in high-income countries or different. We aimed to identify and compare the influences on checklist implementation and compliance in the UK and Africa. Design: Ethnographic study involving observations, interviews and collection of documents. Thematic analysis of the data. Setting: Operating theatres in one African university hospital and two UK university hospitals. Participants: 112 h of observations were undertaken. Interviews with 39 theatre and administrative staff were conducted. Results: Many staff saw value in the checklist in the UK and African hospitals. Some resentment was present in all settings, linked to conflicts between the philosophy behind the checklist and the realities of local cultural, social and economic contexts. Compliance—involving use, completeness and fidelity—was considerably higher, though not perfect, in the UK settings. In these hospitals, compliance was supported by established structures and systems, and was not significantly undermined by major resource constraints; the same was not true of the low-income context. Hierarchical relationships were a major barrier to implementation in all settings, but were more marked in the low-income setting. Introducing a checklist in a professional environment characterised by a lack of accountability and transparency could make the staff feel jeopardised legally, professionally, and personally, and it encouraged them to make misleading records of what had actually been done. Conclusions: Surgical checklist implementation is likely to be optimised, regardless of the setting, when used as a tool in multifaceted cultural and organisational programmes to strengthen patient safety. It cannot be assumed that the introduction of a checklist will automatically lead to improved communication and clinical processes.

Funding

Higher Education Innovation Fund Impact Award; Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award WT097899MA; Department of Health Policy Research Programme (reference number0 770 017)

History

Citation

BMJ Open, 2013, 3 (8), e003039

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

eissn

2044-6055

Available date

11/09/2013

Publisher version

http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/8/e003039.abstract

Language

en