Lightfoot et al_manuscript_Repository.pdf (954.39 kB)
Download file

Colonialism, Slavery and ‘The Great Experiment’: Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotope Analysis of Le Morne and Bois Marchand Cemeteries, Mauritius

Download (954.39 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 22.04.2020, 09:08 by Emma Lightfoot, Sasa Caval, Diego Calaon, Joanna Appleby, Jonathan Santana, Alessandra Cianciosi, Rosa Fregel, Krish Seetah

Slavery, colonialism and emancipation are important aspects of archaeological research in the Atlantic region, but the lifeways of colonial populations remain understudied in the Indian Ocean World. Here, we help to redress this imbalance by undertaking stable isotope analysis (C, N and O) on human remains from Mauritius, a location which played an important role in the movement of people across the Indian Ocean and beyond. The results indicate that a wide range of diets was consumed in Mauritius during the nineteenth century, varying with location and circumstances of birth such that while a range of resources would have been available on the island, the proportions of the different resources consumed was different for different people. Most people consumed some C4 resources, likely maize, although the proportion of the diet that this represented varied widely. There is some evidence for the use of marine resources, with one individual consuming a very high proportion of marine foods. In general, the people buried at the post-emancipation cemetery Le Morne consumed a higher proportion of C4 foodstuffs and a lower proportion of animal protein and/or marine resources than those individuals buried at the formal public cemetery Bois Marchand. The data from La Morne are consistent with a population that lived separately as children and then came to live, and eat, together during adulthood. This study has shown a much more nuanced picture of diet in Mauritius at this time than was previously known. The research complements and enriches the historic narrative, adding dimensions to small islands that would otherwise remain obscure in the absence of rigorous scientific assessment of archaeological finds.

Funding

Funding for the research presented here was provided to the MACH project by the British Council, the British Academy (SG-54650 / SG-10085), the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, and the Office of International Affairs, Stanford University. The work of EL was supported by: the AHRC; Darwin College, University of Cambridge; the FOGLIP project which was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement number GA249642); and the TwoRains project which was funded by the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement number 648609). RF was supported by the “Fundación Canaria Dr. Manuel Morales” fellowship.

History

Citation

Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports Volume 31, June 2020, 102335

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Volume

31

Pagination

102335 - 102335

Publisher

Elsevier

issn

2352-409X

Acceptance date

22/03/2020

Copyright date

2020

Available date

20/04/2020

Publisher version

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X20301267?via=ihub

Language

en