699.pdf (143.19 kB)
Download file

Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions

Download (143.19 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 27.06.2007, 10:38 by S. Bastianello, A. Bozzao, A. Paolillo, E. Giugni, C. Gasperini, T. Koudriavtseva, E. Millefiorini, Mark A. Horsfield, C. Colonnese, D. Toni, M. Fiorelli, C. Pozzilli, L. Bozzao
PURPOSE: To compare fast spin-echo (FSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with conventional spin-echo (CSE) MR imaging in the quantification of the number and volume of multiple sclerosis lesions. METHODS: In 30 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we calculated the total number and volume of lesions detected with each of the three sequences using a semiautomated program. RESULTS: On CSE sequences, we calculated a total of 2,583 lesions with a global volume of 836.3 cm3. With FSE sequences, we observed a 16% relative reduction in the number of lesions detected and a 25% relative reduction in global volume as compared with CSE. With fast FLAIR sequences, we detected a significantly lower number and volume of infratentorial lesions, whereas at the cortical/subcortical level the lesions were both more numerous and bulkier than on CSE sequences. Finally, we observed a higher lesion/white matter contrast, a significant reduction in time required for the quantification of lesion load, and a very low interobserver variability in favor of fast FLAIR sequences. CONCLUSION: Despite its limitations in the detection of infratentorial lesions, the fast FLAIR sequence in conjunction with a semiautomated quantification program provides a reliable means to evaluate the total lesion burden in patients with MS.



American Journal of Neuroradiology, 1997, 18, pp.699-704.

Published in

American Journal of Neuroradiology


American Society of Neuroradiology.

Available date



This article was published in American Journal of Neuroradiology and is available through their website at http://www.ajnr.org/cgi/reprint/18/4/699



Usage metrics