hrlrziegler-immunity FINAL.pdf (704.58 kB)
Download file

Immunity versus human rights: The right to a remedy after benkharbouche

Download (704.58 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 08.01.2020, 14:23 by Katja S. Ziegler
This article critically analyses the judgment in the case of Benkharbouche in which the Court of Appeal declared sections 16(1)(a) and 4(2)(b) of the State Immunity Act 1978 (UK) to be incompatible with Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights because the provisions disproportionately restricted access to justice of service staff of embassies in relation to their employment contracts. At the same time the Court disapplied these provisions because they breached the right to an effective remedy under Article 47 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights. The judgment is welcomed for highlighting the overly restrictive scope of the State Immunity Act in relation to certain employment relationships with diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom, for contributing to the international law of state immunity and for clarifying the national application of the EU Charter. However, the Court’s very cautious approach to the interpretation of a UK statute in the light of international law is criticized. Interpreting the Act in conformity with international law and legislative intent would not have crossed the boundaries of interpretation but would have avoided divergence between remedies available to individuals under the Human Rights Act and those available under EU law.

History

Citation

Human Rights Law Review, 2017, 17 (1), pp. 127-151.

Alternative title

Immunity v Human Rights – or Harmonious Interpretation? Incompatibility of the State Immunity Act with the Human Rights Act and the Right to a Remedy under International and European Law after Benkharbouche

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Law

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Human Rights Law Review

Volume

17

Issue

1

Pagination

127-151

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

issn

1461-7781

eissn

1744-1021

Acceptance date

13/06/2016

Copyright date

2017

Available date

27/01/2019

Publisher version

https://academic.oup.com/hrlr/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngw042

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 24 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en