In defense of Instrumentality final draft CT.pdf (163.45 kB)
Download file

In defence of instrumentality

Download (163.45 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 16.12.2009, 14:41 by Lisanne Gibson
The discussion of the so-called “instrumentalization” of cultural institutions and programmes has been a key focus for the cultural policy, museum and heritage studies literatures over the past few years. This article will challenge the historical accuracy of claims that “instrumentality” is a recent “threat” to the management and funding of culture. Rather I will argue that historically, instrumental cultural policies have been policies of production. Further, through an analysis of the terms of the “instrumentalization debate” in relation to museums I will show that there is no consensus in the understanding of what constitutes instrumental or intrinsic functions. The “instrumental/intrinsic” dichotomy is too simplistic to allow grounded critical engagement with the real complexities of cultural institutions and programmes. Finally, I argue that in order to work critically with institutions, policies and programmes it is necessary to engage with the practicalities of their arrangements. To do so is to recognize the complexity of institutions which are often internally divided. While commentators simply continue to de-construct the “instrumentalist” cultural policy agenda, the reality is that some cultural institutions continue to pay, at best, lip service to the political imperative to become more inclusive. In this social and political context, critical engagement, which is grounded in the practicalities of culture's administration, is crucial if we are to develop analyses that seek to understand and contribute to the development of programmes that break with the elitisms which have characterized cultural programmes in the past.

History

Citation

Cultural Trends, 2008, 17 (4), pp. 247-257.

Published in

Cultural Trends

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

issn

0954-8963

Copyright date

2008

Available date

16/12/2009

Publisher version

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09548960802615380

Language

en

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Exports