File(s) under embargo

Reason: 6 month publisher embargo

1

month(s)

10

day(s)

until file(s) become available

Processing GOTO survey data with the Rubin Observatory LSST Science Pipelines II: Forced Photometry and lightcurves

journal contribution
posted on 01.07.2021, 13:17 by L Makrygianni, J Mullaney, V Dhillon, S Littlefair, K Ackley, MJ Dyer, J Lyman, K Ulaczyk, R Cutter, Y-L Mong, D Steeghs, DK Galloway, P O'Brien, G Ramsay, S Poshyachinda, R Kotak, L Nuttall, E Palle, D Pollacco, E Thrane, S Aukkaravittayapun, S Awiphan, RP Breton, U Burhanudin, P Chote, A Chrimes, E Daw, C Duffy, R Eyles-Ferris, B Gompertz, T Heikkila, P Irawati, M Kennedy, T Killestein, A Levan, T Marsh, D Mata-Sanchez, S Mattila, J Maund, J McCormac, D Mkrtichian, E Rol, U Sawangwit, E Stanway, R Starling, PA Strom, S Tooke, K Wiersema
We have adapted the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Science Pipelines to process data from the Gravitational-wave Optical Transient Observer (GOTO) prototype. In this paper, we describe how we used the LSST Science Pipelines to conduct forced photometry measurements on nightly GOTO data. By comparing the photometry measurements of sources taken on multiple nights, we find that the precision of our photometry is typically better than 20 mmag for sources brighter than 16 mag. We also compare our photometry measurements against colour-corrected Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System photometry and find that the two agree to within 10 mmag (1 ) for bright (i.e., ) sources to 200 mmag for faint (i.e., ) sources. Additionally, we compare our results to those obtained by GOTO’s own in-house pipeline, gotophoto, and obtain similar results. Based on repeatability measurements, we measure a L-band survey depth of between 19 and 20 magnitudes, depending on observing conditions. We assess, using repeated observations of non-varying standard Sloan Digital Sky Survey stars, the accuracy of our uncertainties, which we find are typically overestimated by roughly a factor of two for bright sources (i.e., ), but slightly underestimated (by roughly a factor of 1.25) for fainter sources ( ). Finally, we present lightcurves for a selection of variable sources and compare them to those obtained with the Zwicky Transient Factory and GAIA. Despite the LSST Software Pipelines still undergoing active development, our results show that they are already delivering robust forced photometry measurements from GOTO data.

History

Citation

Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 38 , 2021 , e025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2021.19

Author affiliation

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia

Volume

38

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS

issn

1323-3580

eissn

1448-6083

Copyright date

2021

Available date

04/12/2021

Language

English