Socioeconomic inequality in recovery from poor physical and mental health in mid-life and early old age: prospective Whitehall II cohort study.pdf (358.4 kB)
Download file

Socioeconomic inequality in recovery from poor physical and mental health in mid-life and early old age: prospective Whitehall II cohort study.

Download (358.4 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 09.09.2019, 14:58 by A Tanaka, MJ Shipley, CA Welch, NE Groce, MG Marmot, M Kivimaki, A Singh-Manoux, EJ Brunner
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the influence of socioeconomic status on recovery from poor physical and mental health. METHODS: Prospective study with four consecutive periods of follow-up (1991-2011) of 7564 civil servants (2228 women) recruited while working in London. Health was measured by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire physical and mental component scores assessed at beginning and end of each of four rounds. Poor health was defined by a score in the lowest 20% of the age-sex-specific distribution. Recovery was defined as changing from a low score at the beginning to a normal score at the end of the round. The analysis took account of retirement status, health behaviours, body mass index and prevalent chronic disease. RESULTS: Of 24 001 person-observations in the age range 39-83, a total of 8105 identified poor physical or mental health. Lower grade of employment was strongly associated with slower recovery from poor physical health (OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.91); trend P=0.002) in age, sex and ethnicity-adjusted analyses. The association was halved after further adjustment for health behaviours, adiposity, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and serum cholesterol (OR 0.85 (0.68 to 1.07)). In contrast, slower recovery from poor mental health was associated robustly with low employment grade even after multiple adjustment (OR 0.74 (0.59 to 0.93); trend P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in recovery from poor physical health were explained to a considerable extent by health behaviours, adiposity, SBP and serum cholesterol. These risk factors explained only part of the gradient in recovery for poor mental health.

Funding

The Whitehall II study is supported by grants from the UK Medical Research Council (MRC K013351), British Heart Foundation (BHF RG/16/11/32334) and the US National Institutes on Aging (R01AG013196; R01AG034454).

History

Citation

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2018;72:309-313.

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences

Version

VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

eissn

1470-2738

Acceptance date

30/11/2017

Copyright date

2018

Available date

09/09/2019

Publisher version

https://jech.bmj.com/content/72/4/309

Notes

Whitehall II data, protocols and other metadata are available to bona fide researchers for research purposes. Please refer to the Whitehall II data sharing policy at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/whitehallII/data-sharing.

Language

en

Usage metrics

Categories

Licence

Exports