2015 qrp walls and holes.pdf (129.21 kB)
Download file

Walls and Holes in Psychosocial Research: From Psychoanalysis to Critique

Download (129.21 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 05.08.2015, 08:42 by Ian A. Parker
This commentary reflects on the different innovative motifs introduced into psychosocial research by the contributions to this special issue: the risk of oversubjectification in research placing undue emphasis on the individual reasoning or feeling subject, the attempt to link the “feelings” and “talk” about emotion in one interpretative framework, the place of the interview in research which questions rather than reinforces “identity,” the location of subjects in a “place-assemblage” rather than in their own selves, and the reconfiguration of “mindfulness” so that it opens out to social relations rather than evades them. Focussing on the role of psychoanalysis in psychosocial research, I situate these motifs within the analysis of the machinery of “facialization” offered by Deleuze and Guattari, in which the “white wall” of signification is complemented and locked in place by the “black hole” of subjectivity.

History

Citation

Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2015, 12, pp. 77-82 (6)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/School of Management

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Qualitative Research in Psychology

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

issn

1478-0887

eissn

1478-0895

Acceptance date

02/09/2014

Copyright date

2014

Available date

11/11/2015

Publisher version

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2014.958396#.VcCYK_lK9TY

Language

en